|
[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
[Dysphagia] Living on Air
- Subject: [Dysphagia] Living on Air
- From: SuzMorris at aol.com (SuzMorris@aol.com)
- Date: Sun Oct 3 15:16:41 2004
Dear Candace,
I would agree with you that living organisms require nutrients to thrive.
But the interesting question to me is, could those nutrients somehow be
converted in the body through some energy source other than food? And if so, under
what conditions? I don't propose a specific alternative. I'm basically an
observer. When I see something occur outside the realm of our standard
accepted paradigm, I find it interesting and curious and I'd love to know why
these exceptions exist. I have watched a friend live comfortably without food
and water for 6 years. I cannot deny the reality of that event. It has
puzzled me because it clearly doesn't fit within the accepted paradigm. But it
exists. For me there was still a skepticism about her "real" state of health.
Was it possible that she could appear healthy and energetic externally and
have her cells falling apart inside? I think I was convinced that no one
could do this without a terrible long-term toll on health. then I read about the
man in India who had not taken food or liquid for 65 years and who had gone
through all the medical tests under careful observation conditions with
essentially normal results. I don't think we can deny that these things exist. . .
.that it is possible and within the capacity of the human body to shift to
another system of converting an external substance (i.e. air instead of food)
into the energy we need to grow and thrive. The huge unknown is under what
circumstances is this possible? and how does it work?
One other set of observations that may be relate: Over the years I have
seen a small group of children with autism who eat what we would consider
highly limited, non-nutritious diets without seeming to experience negative
health and growth consequences. One little boy, for example, at age 8 had eaten
nothing but small amounts of white rice and highly processed white bread.
Another child ate crackers and Cheerios and yogurt. Neither child liked to
drink so fluid intake was marginal. The doctors and dietitians who were
working with the children and families wanted them on a more balanced and higher
caloric diet with liquid intake increases. This was impossible orally. However,
they were reluctant to insert a feeding tube for children who were normal in
weight, had appropriate height-weight proportions and head circumference, and
whose blood tests for vitamin and mineral levels were within normal limits.
What was going on in these kids? How did they not only survive, but appear
to thrive? My only hunch is that because of the autism they lived in a very
different world with a different set of beliefs about how life and energy
worked. Is it possible that their detachment from adults with their belief
pressures about eating a balanced diet combined with sensory aversiveness and
discomfort when eating orally, somehow led to their ability to shift to a
different internal system and thrive under these conditions? I'm not saying this is
true of all kids with autism or that this is the reason why these kids were
an exception to our standard way of looking at things. I'm just observing
that these things exist, and opening to the possibility that there are systems
that haven't yet been identified that would explain what some have observed.
I'd love to have that view into the future!
Suzanne
Suzanne Evans Morris, Ph.D.
New Visions
1124 Roberts Mountain Rd.
Faber, VA 22938
(434) 361-2285 ext. 5
www.new-vis.com
In a message dated 9/30/04 6:13:00 PM, candaceg@vitelcom.net writes:
> Dear Suzanne:
> Would you agree that it is a basic rule of nature that living organisms
> require certain nutrients? And would you agree that human beings are living
> organisms? If so, do you propose that there are certain human beings that
> follow a different set of rules, outside of such rules of nature?
>
> Candace Grant
> candaceg@vitelcom.net
>
>
|
|