|
[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
[Dysphagia] "Aspiration tolerance"
Of course; information from the medical tools has to be interpreted within the context of how they're designed. But SLPs don't operate in a vaccuum. The info is useful to the extent that if factors complicate a patient medically, then the factors are important for us to be aware of as aggravating factors. After all, if it'll make it worse, it's not a good thing for a patient, and we should be aware of that.
But these tools aren't designed to tell us directly how to do proceed. Their role can be to help us understand the comorbities big picture. To my knowledge, we don't HAVE an objective measure to guide our interventions.
ps
-----Original Message-----
From: NBurnett at cmh.org
To: dysphagia-bounces at b9.com; lobsterpam at aol.com
Sent: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 9:25 AM
Subject: RE: [Dysphagia] "Aspiration tolerance"
I?d be very interested in your work on a tool to highlight co-morbidities! How useful is the online pneumonia severity index calculator for folks who do not yet have pneumonia? It looks like it?s intended to address morbidity risk for those who actually have pneumonia????? Many thanks, Nancy Burnett,
Speech-Language Pathologist,
Cambridge Memorial Hospital,
700 Coronation Blvd.,
Cambridge, Ontario.
N1R 3G2
Telephone: 519 ? 621 - 2330 ext 1126/Pager 1104
Fax: 519 - 740 ? 4978 Attention Nancy Burnett 3BN
Email: nburnett at cmh.org
-----Original Message-----
From: dysphagia-bounces at b9.com [SMTP:dysphagia-bounces at b9.com] On Behalf Of lobsterpam at aol.com
Sent: January 9, 2007 7:29 AM
To: HAL9600 at aol.com; dysphagia at b9.com
Subject: Re: [Dysphagia] "Aspiration tolerance" The fact people who have had no respiratory complications may aspirate what appear to be huge quantities of multiple consistencies is evidence that the concept of "aspiration tolerance" exists. In the more compromised patient, there would be less "aspiration tolerance." To me, this is evaluated in a decision making process, by noting such things as mobility status, respiratory status, nutrition/hydration status, medical condition and the nature of the diagnosis, general medical condition overall, alertness, oral hygiene status, etc. I don't know of an objective measure from the SLP literature (would love to see one, if it exists), but I've been working on an evaluation schematic to illustrate the importance of co-morbidities (email me if you're interested in seeing it; it's in process), and there are items in the medical literature which are objective in nature. They aren't designed to address how aggressively SLP interventions might proceed, but can help guide the decision! s.
Here's an online tool that Irene has mentioned (Pneumonia severity calculator) http://pda.ahrq.gov/clinic/psi/psi.htm
Here's another print tool:
http://www.aafp.org/fpm/20060400/41outp.html#box_a
In the case you describe, assuming clinically the person looked good but had a history of significant medical issues that appeared to be resolving, I might initiate controlled p.o. trials but would monitor very closely and proceed with caution as the patient tolerated. Part of monitoring patient tolerance is his/her overall status, not just how well he/she is swallowing what we give them. It's vital that we see the patient as a whole. I tell students that we don't really "treat dysphagia," but we manage patients, and that in order to do that, one not only needs to know how to evaluate clinically, but also recognize the importance of comorbidities.
Pam Smith, Ph.D.
Bloomsburg University
Bloomsburg, PA
-----Original Message-----
From: HAL9600 at aol.com
To: dysphagia at b9.com
Sent: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 6:52 PM
Subject: [Dysphagia] "Aspiration tolerance"
Is this a meaningful concept to those on the listserv, and, if so, how is it
evaluated clinically?
SLP's involvement is to evaluate the integrity of the swallow and thus
determine causes of unsafe swallow and to minimize those to allow a person to
eat
and drink. However, especially in the case of someone who is NPO due to a
severe loss of motor integrity from a stroke or TBI, we confront a decision
regarding when to start and how aggressively to proceed with individuals who may seem no worse on clinical and instrumental exam than others with whom we
work. The difference, however, is that these same individuals are virtually or literally immobile due to paralysis or severe paresis, were sometimes in
prolonged coma and in compromised cognitive state, and sometimes have a h/o or
URI
even while on NPO. The same individual may be progressing in terms of
mobility so that we can be guardedly optimistic that the immobility is
temporary
rather than permanent.
In our thought process we try to take into account that even normals
aspirate but tolerate it. We understand the major risk is aspiration of
infected
secretions from poor oral hygiene. But in the scenario I describe, would you
opt to wait a bit, work on other motor competencies, provide as much cognitive
rehabilitation as possible, until, hopefully, this person can move about a
bit and is more resistant to URI as a result? Are there other factors than
immobility that put the individual with otherwise adequate respiratory function at risk and that would cause you to wait, and, if so, how are these
evaluated objectively?
_______________________________________________
Dysphagia mail list: Normal and disordered swallowing information
Dysphagia at b9.com
Manage subscription: http://lists.b9.com/mailman/listinfo/dysphagia
Visit the new Dysphagia Web Forum: http://dysphagia.com/forum
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more. _______________________________________________
Dysphagia mail list: Normal and disordered swallowing information
Dysphagia at b9.com
Manage subscription: http://lists.b9.com/mailman/listinfo/dysphagia
Visit the new Dysphagia Web Forum: http://dysphagia.com/forum
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
|
|