|
[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
[Dysphagia] "Aspiration tolerance"
EEEEEK!
Trace or slightly more aspiration in someone with good lungs to start with
and good oral hygeine and a good immune system, SURE...
but the real question is how much for how long before clinically relevant
and apparent damage begins to occur otherwise. Oh sure, my kids never gets
sick - it's just "sinus" - doesn't everybody seem to catch everything from
the other kids at school? - then we may end up with a major case of
bronchiestasis, abscess, chronic oxygen requirement, etc.
I don't know how much data there is, maybe Irene can help, but I do know
that in the bad old days when everyone thought it was fine for kids with
CP to be badly malnourished and if they didn't choke they were eating just
fine, their life span expectations were also pretty low - lots of kids
just deteriorated as they hit their teenage years and people accepted it
as unpreventable/natural course of condition.
Vikki Stefans, M.D., pediatric physiatrist (rehab doc for kids) at UAMS
and Arkansas Children's Hospital. Working Mom of Sarah T. and Michael C.,
and wife of Henry Stefans. Every mom is a working mom!- OK, dads too.
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 lobsterpam at aol.com wrote:
> The fact people who have had no respiratory complications may aspirate
> what appear to be huge quantities of multiple consistencies is evidence
> that the concept of "aspiration tolerance" exists. In the more
> compromised patient, there would be less "aspiration tolerance." To me,
> this is evaluated in a decision making process, by noting such things as
> mobility status, respiratory status, nutrition/hydration status, medical
> condition and the nature of the diagnosis, general medical condition
> overall, alertness, oral hygiene status, etc. I don't know of an
> objective measure from the SLP literature (would love to see one, if it
> exists), but I've been working on an evaluation schematic to illustrate
> the importance of co-morbidities (email me if you're interested in
> seeing it; it's in process), and there are items in the medical
> literature which are objective in nature. They aren't designed to
> address how aggressively SLP interventions might proceed, but can help
> guide the decision! s.
>
> Here's an online tool that Irene has mentioned (Pneumonia severity
> calculator) http://pda.ahrq.gov/clinic/psi/psi.htm
>
> Here's another print tool:
> http://www.aafp.org/fpm/20060400/41outp.html#box_a
>
> In the case you describe, assuming clinically the person looked good but
> had a history of significant medical issues that appeared to be
> resolving, I might initiate controlled p.o. trials but would monitor
> very closely and proceed with caution as the patient tolerated. Part of
> monitoring patient tolerance is his/her overall status, not just how
> well he/she is swallowing what we give them. It's vital that we see the
> patient as a whole. I tell students that we don't really "treat
> dysphagia," but we manage patients, and that in order to do that, one
> not only needs to know how to evaluate clinically, but also recognize
> the importance of comorbidities.
|
|